EU unveils ‘revolutionary’ laws to curb big tech firms’ power - eviltoast

EU unveils ‘revolutionary’ laws to curb big tech firms’ power::Digital Markets Act aims to allow more competition and let consumers delete preloaded phone apps

  • mattomattic@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    These laws and the ability to remove currently hard-coded apps is a good first step. What citizens the world over should be demanding of their respective law makers is forcing apps to disclose EXACTLY what they do and what they collect and EXACTLY who that gets shared with. For example, there’s many apps that don’t need access to your contacts, location or camera to operate sufficiently, but do that anyway. App creators should be forced to explain WHY their app is accessing that data or utility. Data harvesting is the most lucrative business right now. The underhanded deceitful ways that corporations steal people’s data needs to be made transparent in plain language. The practice of hiding inferred consent to all manner of abuse in legalaleze has to stop. PLAIN FUCKING LANGUAGE! Fail to disclose - You get fined.

    Apologies for TLDR. The latest posts about [auto manufacturers harvesting mountains of personal data without proper consent[(https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/) just broke me. ALL 26 major car manufacturers failing to meet most basic privacy standard. Despite being part of groups that declare they do, they’ve been found to do the exact opposite and in abundance. Together with Google’s contemptuously deceitful WEI, I feel broken, used and pessimistic about any hope of having rights or freedom. We NEED this disclosure and education about apps and data harvesting.

    1. Explain explicitly the app’s required privileges and whether it needs that to function.

    2. Any administrative privilege needs to be explained further, especially if the app doesn’t need more than user status to do it’s expected function.

    3. Exactly what data, files and utilities this app accesses. I mean exactly in detailed plain language, not ambiguous broad sweeping possibilities. And WHY and HOW OFTEN. People might be less inclined to install that stupid little game or social media app if they knew it sends a pulse of data back to the makers every four minutes, even while running in the background.

    4. Exactly what methods of personal tracking is utilized. Exactly what technology is being used and explain it in plain language.

    For example, most people were, and still are, completely ignorant of the fact most Covid apps were just a quick UI tweak of NSO’s citizen tracking software utilizing bluetooth. It connects to ANY discoverable device and logs it’s identity. Then creates a digital mesh that can be used to track any single one of those devices as it moves among all other devices with the app. To spell it out, you can be tracked even if you don’t have that app. People should be told in plain language that their government app makes them part of a surveillance network. Did you honestly think your government could whip up a quality app with such sophistication that worked on nearly all device brands and models in such a short time? THIS IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE - There’s many.

    1. The app should supply a list of EXACTLY who receives the disclosed data the app sends. If some entity other than the ones listed is found to be getting it the app makers are fined.

    2. The app should supply a list of exactly WHO the data is shared with or sold to AFTER it has been received by the nominated recipients. The makers need to list if it’s their intention to sell your data to data brokers, law enforcement or any other entity. If found selling data to any entity not on the list the app maker gets fined.

    You may not install that pregnancy app if you knew they sell the data to law enforcement, or a data broker who has no hesitation doing so. If your data is found to have been sold to anyone not on the list the app maker gets fined.

    1. App makers need to be transparent about data breaches. It needs to be prominent in the app. They need to include both the details and what they’ve done to rectify the breach. Failure to comply - You get fined.

    The data harvesting and brokering industry is abusive and deceptive. Forcing app developers to disclose everything the app does in detail could help people make informed decisions instead of having their right to privacy prison-raped. It would lead to better software, and, it would force these corporate entities to implement better security practices and security on their networks and servers. The current amount and frequency of data breaches is astounding. These incompetent corporate assholes want to make money off your data and do almost nothing to ensure it’s safety.

    I’m not saying developers, governments and corporations can’t have or sell data. Or create a profile on you for marketing purposes. They would just have to be completely transparent, up front and honest about it, or get fined. Imagine this world.

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just saying that the German COVID tacking App was actually pretty privacy friendly and good. That being said, the Luca app that was more common was a mess.

    • AVengefulAxolotl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely agreed.

      “Hey check this app/service out! You see it is very cool, you can do all sorts of awesome things with! And on page 69420 you consent to your soul being sold and keep using it well!”