☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoIt's ok to resist capitalism on an iPhonemedia.mas.toimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down114
arrow-up179arrow-down1imageIt's ok to resist capitalism on an iPhonemedia.mas.to☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Socialism@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarerelative_iterator@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAt least the iPhone has a much better track record for privacy and security.
minus-squareZeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAll alternatives are capitalist too. Even the Fairphone. If anyone thinks different they might want to consider to look up what capitalism means.
minus-squarePapyrusOsiris@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoSecurity through obscurity is no security at all. You’ve fallen for the marketing if you think apple cares about your privacy any more than any other big tech company.
minus-squaresoybison@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoYou’re right! And the reason why is because they have to compete in a public competition!
At least the iPhone has a much better track record for privacy and security.
All alternatives are capitalist too. Even the Fairphone. If anyone thinks different they might want to consider to look up what capitalism means.
Security through obscurity is no security at all. You’ve fallen for the marketing if you think apple cares about your privacy any more than any other big tech company.
You’re right! And the reason why is because they have to compete in a public competition!