In the US, is this actually the moment past the point of no return? - eviltoast
  • juli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    democracy survived

    LMAO!!

    Choosing between two candidate picked by lobbyists/corporations, and anyone else not having a slightest chance in hell isn’t a democracy, but hey, you do you.

    It’s slightly better than China/Russia having a single candidate and everyone else is just for show.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It is a democracy.

      Not a good type, but still a democracy.

      Remember, Democracy and Autocracy isnt binary states of its either a Full Totalitarian Regime or a Full Direct Flawless Democracy.

      There’s a sliding scale in between.

      We don’t just go from Monarchies to a perfect Utopian Flawless Democratic system overnight. Change is incremental.

      I do agree with the sentiment that 2 party system isn’t really a good idea, that very much need to be changed.

      But its not like the constitution says “The United States shall be a 2-party system”, its an emergent property of First-Past-The-Post electoral systems. But unfortunately, human brains always look for the first thing they think of, I mean “Most Votes Win” sounds simple right. People never thought about the fact that “Most” doesn’t mean majority, but by the time people realize, its too late, people go too used to it.

      But its still a democracy, a very very flawed democracy. But if you argue that First-Past-The-Post isn’t a democracy, then most of the world are living in dictatorships.