Anon questions our energy sector - eviltoast
  • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    A hydro damn breaking has killed more people than Chernobyl before, and probably will again. Renewables are not perfect either unfortunately. Though some are slightly safer than nuclear.

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most are safer than nuclear, but until the environmental cost of manufacturing them is outweighed by the benefit of their use then nuclear is the least intolerable stopgap.

        • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Some do. Hydro is a net positive, not sure about wind but probably, but last I heard solar not so much. That may have changed since.

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I know manufacturing panels and batteries have a significant environmental cost. Being a net negative though I am not sure about. Could you link some sources?