Where does porn addiction awareness stop and conservatism begins? - eviltoast

Pretty straightforward: where does the awareness that porn wrecks your mind and sexuality stops and where does simply conservatism towards sexuality begins (even in cases akin to bolshe morality)?

EDIT: okay, better clarifying it - i came across some video from some youtuber claiming that pornography is evil, period. and that there are things such as “metapornography”, which could apply to someone in instagram posting videos of themselves in scant dressing and claiming likes of it. and that no-fap and anti-masturbation movements are good things.

i was really confused about that since that person came from apparently a progressive-yet-moralistic background. but talking to other people to see if some of my impressions checked, it came to my mind that it was a heavily directed video intended to attract left-leaning people to a conservative agenda. my bad.

  • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Are you arguing gooners don’t have a problem?

    Many people become addicted to pornography and yes it can wreck your mind and regular sex drive/habits just as any addiction can.

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Please don’t put some ridiculous binary statement in my mouth. There’s miles of distance between “porn wrecks your mind” and “excessive porn use can contribute to mental health and relationship issues”.

      • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Porn wrecks your mind?

        Porn stops your sexuality? Wtf.

        you shouldn’t assume even your starting framework is agreed upon

        Why wonder about people who think porn stunts their sexuality (still wtf?!?)

        You mentioned it multiple times but the only things you said about these statements were harshly dismissive and didn’t provide any sort of nuance so why would it be ridiculous for me to respond as if there wasn’t nuance in your opinion? I don’t know what’s in your heart/mind, only what you say.

          • TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            I didn’t say you invent those phrases, I said that you harshly dismissed them with no recognition of the limited truth they hold, so why would you expect me to know you recognize the nuance?

            How can I “put some ridiculous binary statement” in your mouth when I’m just reacting to the binary you already presented.

            It like if someone says " all drugs are bad because they ruin your life".

            and you say “wtf that’s not true, drugs don’t ruin your life” without mentioning that you’re only talking about some drugs.

            Obviously I’m going to point out that, no, drugs can ruin your life if you partake in them the wrong way, because drug addicts do have a problem and you dismissed it through ignoring it, even if that’s not your intention. I can’t know your hidden intentions, only what you post.