---- - eviltoast
  • AmidFuror
    link
    fedilink
    42 months ago

    Sexual selection is different than what is “needed” by a species. Males who are able to fight off others and therefore are the exclusive mates of a large group of females will propagate the genes that reinforce their physical prowess and aggressive behavior.

    This also benefits the females if they will have sons who are more likely to win their own harems.

    But there are also competing strategies. Sneaky males who can mate with another male’s group without fighting him off will also propagate their genes. Females in the group benefit if they will have sneaky male offspring who will be similarly successful.

    “Strong” is not the default for “most likely to have offspring.” There are many strategies, including monogamous species which invest together in their offspring. Evolutionary psychology can get oversimplified and misapplied, especially by beta males whose mothers hurt their feelings and now lash out at women whenever they get the chance. That last bit was an attempt at irony, btw.

    • @1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Yeah that’s true. I was just describing the basics to not have to write that entire thing you just wrote. :)

      • AmidFuror
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        I can’t read your mind, but it seemed like you might be making a generalization about fish that you might think applies more broadly. But I can’t know that, so if you say you have a more nuanced view but didn’t want to spell it all out, that certainly could be the case.

        • @1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I mean, yeah, I assume most people don’t say everything they know about a topic. It would be exhausting to listen to.

          What you wrote is something I think everyone learns in school also.