subignition
Other accounts:
@subignition (dead?)
@subignition
- 1 Post
- 792 Comments
subignition@fedia.ioto News@lemmy.world•Hundreds detained at Detroit-Windsor border after wrong turn toward Ambassador Bridge | FOX 2 Detroit26·2 days agoOh FUCK right off you insufferable cunts. They took a wrong turn. Make them do a U and go home.
Seriously. “What? This is a border? I did not intend to cross the border, please let me turn around” should be the entirety of this situation
subignition@fedia.ioto politics @lemmy.world•Exclusive: Trump’s D.C. Prosecutor Threatens Wikipedia’s Tax-Exempt Status201·4 days agowhat a weird, out-of-pocket thing to say
subignition@fedia.ioto Technology@lemmy.zip•4chan Is Dead. Its Toxic Legacy Is Everywhere45·7 days agoIt didn’t have any algorithm for popularity. It was newest first, posts bumped threads to the top, and posts got deleted very quickly when they fell beyond the maximum length. That’s how I remember it working, anyway.
subignition@fedia.ioto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Cox charges you $25 if your credit card is declined111·15 days agoYou could’ve chosen not to victim blame, but yet you did it anyway.
All banks in the US have similar authority, please see my lengthy post under the CFPB link elsewhere in the thread if you are actually here to discuss rather than sling cheap insults
subignition@fedia.ioto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Cox charges you $25 if your credit card is declined9·15 days agoTL;DR:
- If it’s an ATM or one-time debit card transaction, you have to opt-in for them to charge you a fee
- If you didn’t opt-in, they are still allowed to cover the overdraft if they want to by taking from other accounts you have with them, they just can’t charge you an extra fee for doing so.
- If the overdraft is due to a preauthorized/recurring debit card transaction, a check, ACH, or other transaction not covered by 17(b)(1), your consent doesn’t matter, they get to charge you a fee.
Please look at the wording of 17(b)(1), emphasis mine:
Except as provided under paragraph © of this section, a financial institution holding a consumer’s account shall not assess a fee or charge on a consumer’s account for paying an ATM or one-time debit card transaction pursuant to the institution’s overdraft service, unless the institution:
The opt-in requirement is ONLY for ATM and one-time debit card transactions. For a preauthorized or recurring transaction like dinckelman was discussing, that does not apply.
Also some relevant sections of the official interpretation of 17(b):
- No affirmative consent. A financial institution may pay overdrafts for ATM and one-time debit card transactions even if a consumer has not affirmatively consented or opted in to the institution’s overdraft service. If the institution pays such an overdraft without the consumer’s affirmative consent, however, it may not impose a fee or charge for doing so. These provisions do not limit the institution’s ability to debit the consumer’s account for the amount overdrawn if the institution is permitted to do so under applicable law.
- Outstanding Negative Balance. If a fee or charge is based on the amount of the outstanding negative balance, an institution is prohibited from assessing any such fee if the negative balance is solely attributable to an ATM or one-time debit card transaction, unless the consumer has opted into the institution’s overdraft service for ATM or one-time debit card transactions. However, the rule does not prohibit an institution from assessing such a fee if the negative balance is attributable in whole or in part to a check, ACH, or other type of transaction not subject to the prohibition on assessing overdraft fees in § 1005.17(b)(1).
subignition@fedia.ioto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Cox charges you $25 if your credit card is declined132·15 days agoEdit: Opt-in requirement is specifically only for ATM transactions and one-time debit card transactions. It would not apply to a monthly transaction as described above. Read my post further down for full details.
That is not necessarily true. I opened a savings account recently and their terms were basically “We normally reject transactions that would cause an overdraft but we may choose not to at our sole discretion and if we do pay it you will owe us”
subignition@fedia.ioto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•this is not satire this is not satire this is not satire16·15 days agolook again. subject’s right hand has 5 fingers plus a thumb
subignition@fedia.ioto Games@lemmy.world•Nintendo confirms $90 price for full Breath of the Wild experience on Switch 25·16 days agoThe upgrade pack is also free for Expansion Pack tier switch online subscribers from what I’ve heard at least for botw/totk. So if youre already on one of those for N64/GBA/Genesis/GameCube then it’s no extra cost
subignition@fedia.ioto Games@lemmy.world•Nintendo confirms $90 price for full Breath of the Wild experience on Switch 22·16 days agoChrono Trigger MSRP was $70 iirc and some titles were even $80
subignition@fedia.ioto Games@lemmy.world•Nintendo confirms $90 price for full Breath of the Wild experience on Switch 2154·16 days agoI think breath of the wild has always been overpriced lol. And it’s not news that Nintendo rarely ever discounts their older games. But the vast majority of people who are gonna want to play it on switch 2 already own a copy ( I hope).
I wonder what this’ll do to the price of used physical copies
subignition@fedia.ioto Games@lemmy.world•Nintendo confirms $90 price for full Breath of the Wild experience on Switch 23317·16 days ago$10 to replay it, replay meaning you already have the switch version. Or free if you have switch online expansion pack. It’s only going to set you back 90 (instead of 80) if you’ve never owned it and you want it on switch 2
Get yo ass a therapist, it shouldn’t be acceptable to talk about yourself like this.
He didn’t drop the ludicrous tariffs on China. This is going to get worse again and fast.
subignition@fedia.ioto World News@lemmy.world•China raises tariffs on U.S. goods to 84% in retaliation to Trump tariffs4·21 days agoThey’re probably going to try spinning it as China being scared (because their number is lower than Trump’s number) but I think China is probably just flexing. confident they don’t need to go any harder for the US to destroy itself
subignition@fedia.ioto The Onion and other satire w/ layers@sh.itjust.works•RFK Jr. orders removal of sinks from HHS bathrooms4·21 days agoIt’s definitely possible; the question is whether he’s stupid enough to try it yet
subignition@fedia.ioto The Onion and other satire w/ layers@sh.itjust.works•RFK Jr. orders removal of sinks from HHS bathrooms17·21 days agoThank goodness this is the onion. I almost bought it uncritically.
subignition@fedia.ioto Games@lemmy.world•Switch 2 Tutorial Game Welcome Tour Costs $10, Nintendo Explains Why It's Not a Free Console Pack-In - IGN23·22 days agoFor 10 bucks, it better have a button combination that unlocks Mario Paint 2.
I haven’t seen a damn thing in the marketing that justifies it being anything other than free. If it’s worth 10 bucks, you better show that shit off. The audacity to call it “welcome tour” with a $10 price tag is wild
subignition@fedia.ioto Leopards Ate My Face@lemmy.world•Jim Cramer: Trump’s Tariffs Make Me ‘Feel Like a Sucker’8·23 days agogotta respect a bro who loves his asparagus
MOISTURIZE ME