@iloveDigit - eviltoast

whoever loves Digit

Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she’s safe.

To anyone I’ve ever treated unfairly, I apologize.

  • 5 Posts
  • 177 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: October 27th, 2025

help-circle









  • Seems like you’re trying to passive aggressively bait me into a fair response on a platform with rules like “respectful communication” that are often doublespeak - red flags for a possibility that the person reacting fairly will be banned, while the person being passive aggressive is rewarded with herd mentality upvotes and dopamine.

    Try this response on nostr, where I can’t be banned for responding, if you want to make it look more possible that you may have been replying in good faith and not just to waste my time / attempt to cyberbully me.






  • That all makes perfect sense, but is hilarious when you consider the Pixel’s backdoors aren’t a secret. The whole “risk of revealing” thing is just funny because these devices openly have closed source shit in them, it’s not like they’re somehow hiding insidiously subtle exploits within seemingly secure code or something.

    French police are embarrassing themselves asking for new backdoors instead of access to existing ones, like it’s not public info that there’s closed source shit in a Pixel. Random people in the general public embarrass themselves by taking this to mean the closed source shit in a Pixel is magically secure (“otherwise why would the French police be frustrated”). French police probably know more than they’re pretending to know, but just willingly embarrass themselves to “keep it secret” even though it’s, again, not secret. Or maybe they’re just detectives who can’t find public info about closed source blobs? More “detectivey” with face to face stuff, not so clever at understanding wiki pages? It’s all very silly