

Why am I getting DOGE flashbacks?
Why am I getting DOGE flashbacks?
It’s called “OEM install”.
Ubuntu based distros should have it.
That look is more of a “get the wet food out servant!” to me.
<David Attenborough voice>
And here we have the elusive fibre vampire, found in the midst of feasting on its second most common prey the paper towel roll.
It looks like we have startled it and it is displaying its fangs to ward us off.
This specimen looks to be a young juvenile male just coming into his adult plumage.
We shall leave him in peace to finish his meal.
</David Attenborough voice>
Easy fix, start giving them a head rub then when they move their head to provide better access to the part they want rubbed or scritched use your other hand to slide the book out.
Or concerned about your fashion choices.
Go to:
Settings > All settings > Webserver and API > webserver.session.timeout > Then change the value to “604800” for a 7 day log in like v5 had (or other value as needed).
They are hard at work hunting the mouse (cursor).
Of course it would be a Nvidia driver issue.
Thought about getting a AMD card but as I had only had one major issue with my previous 1070 (that was fixed by reloading my Timeshift snapshot then not upgrading the driver until the next version) so I thought that I would continue with Nvidia.
Eh, I can’t change it for now but at least I know what is causing it and can work around it.
Thanks for the assist.
Just made a reply to Björn Tantau.
Here is what I started with:
And what I have today after 3 suspends:
Will check after work today.
I like WiFi access points as they require no special configuration on the computer, can be placed where they get the best signal, due to their larger antennas they get better reception and they often have several LAN ports allowing multiple devices to be connected to it.
If you still want to use a USB or PCIE WiFi then you are best served by looking for a card with intel chip sets as their drivers are included in the Linux kernel so they are often plug and play.
The did explain this in the “Watercare responds” section, in a “we have to word this so it won’t cause problems in court” fashion.
The problem is their message was lost in the forest of “oh woah betide this property developer not being able to build” that was most of the article.
The article is 85% about the property developer and what they wanted, very biased and poor reporting.
From the sounds of it there is about 4000 more connections worth of capacity before the current system is at 100% capacity.
This sounds like a lot but ideally you do not want to run a system at 100% capacity for long periods as it leaves no spare capacity for surge events (where there is a sudden short term increase in usage), weather events and such like.
It also creates problems with loss of capacity due to equipment breakdown &/or maintenance, when that happens and they can’t fix it quickly enough then the raw waste will have to be temporarily stored (causing the equipment to be running at over 100% capacity running a much higher risk of further equipment breakdowns to deal with the normal usage plus the stored waste) or more likely minimally treated then released into the ocean.
So restricting the use of the remaining capacity while it causes problems for people who want to develop properties it saves rate payers hundreds of thousands of dollars in unexpected waste water costs and reduces the chances of the council having to release waste into the environment.
Three things,
“I’ve been trying to reach you about your cars extended warranty”
Have you done “sudo sensors-detect”?