Related: Alt + .
, to cycle through arguments used in previous commands
Related: Alt + .
, to cycle through arguments used in previous commands
Could you uh… elaborate a little?
Instant sub, cheers.
STORM CLOUDS, FIRE AND STEEL
DEATH FROM ABOVE, MADE THEIR ENEMY KNEEL
SHINING ARMOR AND WINGS
DEATH FROM ABOVE, IT’S AN ARMY OF KINGS!
I’ll bet Ada Lovelace had some somewhere.
Or the original plot of The Matrix, before the studio execs decided audiences were too stupid.
“Boy, I sure wish some megacorporation would dump a massive codebase on me to maintain without any financial assistance!”
I’m all for rules of engagement, but when the enemy seems to be gunning for genocide, I’m pretty sure everything’s on the table.
This reads like an ad written by an LLM, wtf is it doing here?
Cats make for pretty poor insect control. They mostly kill spiders, not “pest” insects.
Was not prepared for the Diablo II reference lmao
Yeah, I’d like to see a source for this. There have been many proposed theories for why cats vocalize to humans, especially because “meowing” is not common between cats except for kittens. How do we know that it isn’t a request for food or attention?
“Allow us to introduce ourselves”
As long as I don’t have to maintain it.
(Who tf downvoted this? The “legacy code” lobby?)
FYI, “anthropomorphizing” doesn’t strictly mean “viewing as human”. I never meant to imply that people see a spoon as a human being.
Anthropomorphization is the act of associating human qualities with non-human entities.
My point is that humans are remarkably good at doing this, even as far as, e.g., ascribing “unhappiness” to a spoon simply for being unused.
This kind of behavior is why we must be extremely wary of the Turing test and other measures of machine “intelligence” - humans may see intelligence even where none exists simply because it’s our nature.
Yep, this is the major flaw that’s becoming clear about the Turing test, and why people are so hyped over LLMs: computers don’t have to be good at imitating people, because people are so good at anthropomorphizing computers (along with everything else).
This joke is much simpler if you’re bisexual.
You’re just Bismuth.
The “solution” is to curate things, invest massive human resources in it
Hilariously, Google actually used to do this: they had a database called the “knowledge graph” that slowly accumulated verified information and relationships between commonly-queried entities, producing an excellent corpus of reliable, easy-to-find information about a large number of common topics.
Then they decided having people curate things was too expensive and gave up on it.
Lost the coin flip.
The charge rate’s pretty slow, sure, but the battery isn’t very big, so it evens out.