Somehow you turned something so lighthearted into something so pointlessly judgemental.
Like yeah we shouldn’t eat sugary cereals, and if it’s expensive a good alternative is to cut it out. This is just facts.
No need to go digging around their post history like that. It’s just kinda weird
Guess Americans can flee to Cuba
I would fully accept a law that allowed companies to advertise nationally the pre-tax price with a small disclaimer saying applicable taxes vary by location, and then require the in store price tags to reflect all taxes.
There’s no excuse not to anymore. Yes it does vary, and a computer can easily adjust the price.
In this case I understand not downsizing until your kids are established with a job/place to live.
Depending on equity and their mortgage payment it may not even be possible to downsize without paying more per month. That’s the insanity of the current market.
Remember this is an occupied family home with an unoccupied room. Not a whole property.
What would you suggest?
A lot of kids move back after college. I definitely wouldn’t downsize until my family was secure and for sure no longer needed the space.
Now the question is it better to allow that space sit vacant or rent out the space.
I think there is a defensible position for renting out a temporarily unused space in your primary home versus buying vacant properties solely to rent.
Sure you can argue they dont need that space, but a lot of kids return after college. If I had kids I’d only downsize once they are well established. It’s about ensuring the security of your family and ensuring they have a place to come back to.
Is it better to let that sit space vacant for 4+ years though?
Maybe in asking to be flayed, but I’ll bite too.
I’m personally considering renting out my home when I go for grad school. I’d have to be renting elsewhere, but I intend to return.
I can’t really sell the house. I wouldn’t get enough from the sale to buy another home and I bought it at a much lower interest rate than available. I basically wouldn’t be able to afford a home again after grad school.
I’m not wealthy by any means, and couldn’t afford for the home to sit vacant. Right now I’m offering it to a family member for what they pay in a bad neighborhood for rent to help them get ahead a bit. I’d still be getting less than the mortgage.
I want to further my education and keep my home, but I can’t afford a mortgage for an empty property and rent elsewhere.
Is this truly a bad thing?
Not an apartment complex, but a building makes sense.
I’m not saying it’s just, but there are some loans that allow you to buy a quadplex but you have to live there. You are free to rent out the remaining units.
Exactly, I’d argue kids are the most likely to go to lengths to circumvent the rules
Forget tax havens, eventually some countries will probably become content havens and sell server space hosted there. Probably some carribean island
You could probably chop 1000 calories and handwash your bottoms more often
And that’s why our species will die in the muck after we drain this planet of everything it needs to support our lives
You could double everything in this post too and that’s only 60% consumption.
That seems a lot more reasonable to me and we still come in under carrying capacity
If you look at the numbers in your own post these laws are used very rarely, and in every state a fraction of petitions applied for are granted.
There needs to be actual evidence greater than “ex girlfriend said so” for a court to grant the request.
Ironically by the numbers Florida seems to be the state most likely to use the law. Granting a total of 2,355 in 2020. California on the other hand has issued only 984. These are the 3rd and 1st most populous states respectively.
Given how many people go through breakups each year and how many people are insanely petty, seems like it’s not just based on a disgruntled ex’s word.
My understanding is there is not a single state with red flag laws that allow all weapons to be seized based on one person’s word. Well other than a doctor giving a professional diagnosis.
For everyone else you have to have some evidence. Either multiple people witnessing threats/harassment video, or text based evidence.
And here I am going to get a MA in Archaeology lol.
It’ll work out hopefully. I have been gainfully employed in the field off of just my BA, but Trump has basically ruined that job
Depending on the company/the department, it’s also a goal to avoid legal trouble. Which can sometimes benefit the employee, but if HR is acting in your benefit there’s a decent chance you could have sued the company
I’m the mac n cheese guy
What’s funny is it very clearly see a bear there.
Not sure if I’d be able to make it out in person, but the image makes it so very clear to me.
I think so. They keep saying the gunman meant to go to the NFL offices in the same building. With the source being “trust me bro”. Like they’ve released nothing.
I think the truth is this is a copycat killer going after the corporate elite and they want to hide that.