All language is not created equal. There is language with vast context (irl, face to face, between acquaintances, in a shared ultrarich physical environment) and language with minimal context (social media). That’s a big important difference.

I agree. And criteria for the moderators too of course.

What do you suppose it implies? What signs might we expect?

What do you suppose it implies?

Ah yes, the days of IRC chat.

I’m shooting for an objective, real-value kind of perspective here.

Surely we aren’t striving for quantity over quality. Because that’s where this sorta leads

Jump for that low hanging fruit little buddy

This ignores the case of a private insult issued to the moderator, pre or post censorship.

A moderator might disagree.

Oompaloompas.

Willy Wonka had to literally rescue them and protect them to keep them from being eaten because they’re so delicious.

I haven’t actually needed to do much of that. Very little actually. And when I did it was just a trivial copy-paste

Bowline is a very cool and useful knot

Ya, there’s less wiggle room.

There’s a narrowness, a deludedness, that tends to come with experthood. I prefer the wideness

Well I stated that I think the opposite clearly enough.

I appreciate the depth but ya. Wideness

Good bye

A medieval religious zealot’s style of argumentation is characterized by his appeal to dogma.

You argue like a medieval religious zealot. And that seems to be completely normal.

You’ve changed…

I was offering a completely different point, to rhynoplaz there.