No problem. I’m with you on the why part.

Obvious Plant?

Ted Kaczynski, the “Unabomber”.

Are these the crips and bloods?

Agreed. That was amazing.

Oh good one. RIP to Peter and Lemmy.

Oh sorry. I agree with everything you said in your reply. I was just being stupid. I quite liked your post, and I myself am not religious. Mainly just wanted to mention old Gregg.

Great post, I had a quite sensible chuckle when I read it.

What’re you doing in my swamp, mother-licker?

We do not. But maybe he created the funk.

Pasteurization doesn’t boil the milk though…

“The village’s decline has instead been attributed to its distance from clean drinking water and unsuitable soil for cultivation.”

2spooky4me.

But really? What’s so creepy about this page?

Make sure to use every part though. Prostitute stock is the best.

Many horror movies that I didn’t watch around Halloween.

Direct action maybe?

Lemmy.

Maybe he was actually crucified, but if he was, it was not for our sins. That part is as real as the Easter bunny or Old Gregg.

Huh, didn’t think about not moving, I can see how that could help (at least I think, I haven’t touched it in a year or so haha). You’re right though, there’s lots of habits from the others to break.

I still have it downloaded, so I may as well give it a try. Once I finish off some of the higher level chalice dungeons I’ve recently gotten back into.

Thanks for the advice, I will let you know if I have any questions.

Yeah I think so. Thanks for explaining. I’m on a couple more anarchist communities here, but I’ll look those up. I’ll still be checking out posts here though.

Thanks again!

I’ve only heard good things. Not actually sure why I haven’t yet. I’ll get it on sale at some point. Just got back into Bloodborne doing some of the higher level dungeons, so I’ll be occupied for a bit.

Woah, no need to get so angry, I’m merely asking questions (which you’re not providing answers to).

I’m refuting the one thing you’ve mentioned multiple times; the “contaminated” source of fluoride. You make it seem like it’s dangerous because “it comes from the smoke stack scrubbers of fertilizer plants.” Why do you keep bringing this up?

Since you brought it, up have you studied this at a university level? While I have not directly studied the fluoridation of water in university, I have studied chemistry. That is where all my questions are coming from. I’m not concerned about this from a dental perspective.

While that article is peer-reviewed and has sources, it’s pertaining to a very specific region, and also is published in a fairly obscure journal with a trash impact factor.

This is also the first I’ve heard mention of pre-eruption benefits of fluoride. I’ve never stated I believe this, and have not heard anyone else mention this in favour of fluoridation.

Also as I mentioned in a previous comment, I am in no way saying the individual with a PhD in a social science is “full of shit”. I’m just saying the article is an opinion piece, and reads like a conspiracy theorist wrote it. Think Charlie and Pepe Silvia from IASIP.

Many scientists (research-based) go into public policy as well. Mainly because they’re capable of thinking critically and are able to contribute to policy in their area of expertise.

Also for the third time, are you a scientist, or have any scientific background?

Doesn’t questioning all these things you’re saying display critical thinking?