No call on a blatant facemask. Vikings vs Rams - eviltoast
  • yeehawboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 days ago

    Worst part is also, isn’t this roughing the passer also with contact to the head of Darnold also? Or is he out of the pocket so it doesn’t count? Idk. Still insane to miss this

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 days ago

    The consistency of penalty enforcement in the NFL is a complete joke. The disparity in pass interference calls is egregious.

    • FUsername@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Especially considering the money the make plus the fact how easy it was to avoid this. They have someone in the both anyways.

  • Xbeam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    Even without the facemask, that should be reviewable since the result of the play was a score. Makes no sense.

    • TheCannonball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Agreed but the play was reviewable. However, there are rules saying you can’t call a new penalty during a review. This needs to change.

  • bobotron@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I wouldn’t mind facemask being added to the challenge list. It’s such a black and white call