Both is good - eviltoast
  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t understand how minimal maintenance on roads is less expensive than the equipment and personnel to drive through it on a frequent basis?

    That’s worrying indictment of the education system.

    • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure what your comparing here, but there are constant budget shortfalls for rural paving in my state. It’s not cheap. There’s also the cost to build the roads (and run electric, phone, internet, etc). There’s a reason we needed a bunch of subsidies to add services to rural (and even suburban) places. I think we owe it to everyone in our society to provide basic services, but we don’t have to pretend it isn’t expensive to do so.

      https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2017/1/9/the-real-reason-your-city-has-no-money

    • mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Actually I understand it just fine. My city alone has a $4.4B road maintenance backlog, and it’s not that big of a city

      It’s cheap”er” to maintain roads. It is not cheap. Use Google next time

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Actually I understand it just fine. My city alone has a $4.4B road maintenance backlog, and it’s not that big of a city

        And how much do you think a transit system that is meaningfully comparable to cars would cost?

        Edit: either big"I was told there would be no fact checking!" vibes from anonymous downvoters or sour grapes on my end., I guess.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The taxes might be cheaper, but everyone on these cheap roads purchases their own car, their own insurance, wastes their own time in traffic, lives near nothing but a church an hour walk away, etc.

      • flames5123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m curious so let’s explore this. Say someone in a rural area needs to drive 10 mins down the road a day and 10 mins back. Let’s say you employ one person for just 12 hours at federal minimum wage. That’s $609/week PLUS maintenance and gas on the bus. If someone owned their car/truck and paid maybe $2.50/gal with a 15mpg car, that would only be like $1.70 a day for them. (30mph20min/15mpg$2.5/gal*7(days)=$11.67). That community would only need 60 people taking the exact same path as the bus to make it worth it for them.

        I’m all for public transit. I take it to work a few times a week and even when doing leisure, but it’s not a replacement for extra-suburb transit.

    • lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem comes when people who insist on living away from civilization demand the perks of civilization by being able to drive to a city and park their cars for free.

      This becomes very expensive, and degrades the quality of life of those who live in the City.