Nintendo shuts down Switch emulator Ryujinx - eviltoast
  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I think anyone still in the scene will want to lay low for a while and work in the shadows. Only releasing after a few years.

    I hope they dont go for dolphin or cemu claiming that certain games are in their e-shop for the switch 2 release.

    Either way I think we should start backing up emulators and their source and require files regularly as a fallback.

    • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I mean, all of these emulators are already very well archived and available from several sources, not to mention downloaded to the devices of millions of people. I highly doubt we would be in danger of losing any of them even if Nintendo were to sue literally all of them overnight. Well, except for things like Github issues and pull requests, nobody bothers to archive those unfortunately.

      But yeah, IMO the danger is moreso that the attacks are leading to a massive chilling effect and loss of developer talent in the emulation community.

    • josephsh5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I hope they dont go for dolphin or cemu claiming that certain games are in their e-shop for the switch 2 release.

      That’s exactly what I’m afraid of

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m a bit salty this was apparently announced through Discord. Was it even posted anywhere else?

    The future of social media is fragmented siloes, I guess.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I will never not be pissed off that the overwhelming majority of communities that made the internet vibrant especially when nerding out about niche stuff just happily moved to discord and foreclosed their futures.

      Everytime I get down on the fediverse I think about what discord did to online communities I loved and I get fired up again.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wouldn’t have an issue with many different communications platforms if they didn’t all require an account (also Discord not being indexable sucks).

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Discord is even worse, as you need to find an invite to a specific Discord, and sometimes go through a lengthy sign up process for each Discord.

        Some won’t let you sign up without a phone #.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Matrix.

        And… Lemmy.

        It doesn’t matter though, the problem is the critical mass is migrating to Discord and shunting everything out of view. Honestly that’s much worse than being on Reddit, even now.

        • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Matrix does not have seamless desktop sharing or voice chat, and has a drastically higher executive cost. It also does not solve the information silo issue.

          The fediverse as a whole is promising but likely needs to mature a bit longer. Theres a lot of potential issues that have yet to be worked through.

  • xan1242@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    I need to remind some people here who don’t seem to understand something.

    Forks may be dead and development may not be as fast as the original.

    However - you must think about the future and not the situation right now. Yuzu and Ryujinx sources will be invaluable information for people making emulators later down the line.

    It’s a matter of when and not if someone picks it up again.

    • garret@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agree. Was thinking exactly the same this afternoon. If there would be a new generational console evolution (like it happened from the Wii to the Switch), then the when would be much faster. However, since it seems Nintendo is going for a Switch 2, I am just sad that Switch emulators will be halted for several years :/

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah hopefully.

      I said this in another thread; I hope whoever picks it up keeps their dev team anonymous or prepares to enter this era’s legal battle, especially since it was supposedly already decided with an old Sony lawsuit against emulators.

        • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Huh, just realized Yuzu was GPLv3. That’s weird. Citra was GPLv2 and Yuzu is a Citra fork. Some of the Citra devs were Yuzu developers, but not all of them, so I wonder how they handled the relicensing. Yuzu had a CLA attributing copyright to the creators, so that wouldn’t have been a problem, but Citra had not such thing.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, this is dumb.

    I own original hardware and buy 100% of my games but sometimes you just wanna run games that aren’t originally crossplatform on your Steamdeck for convenience, or on a PC with resolution upscaling, or for ease of streaming the gameplay, or tons of other legitimate reasons.

    Nintendo has some great IP and gameplay, and I guarantee you their sales are not meaningfully hurt by people who pirate/emulate games. Those people were never their customers anyway. If anything the emulation community enabled streamers to boost the popularity of their games. (People like PointCrow did more for the sustained popularity of BOTW than all of Nintendo’s marketing efforts combined)

    • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m one of those weirdos who actually dumps all my own games with my own modded launch Switch mainly for preservation purposes.

      But then TotK came out and performed so poorly on the console itself, I exported my save to play on PC and Steam Deck. Every part of my Switch emulation journey has been legal and by-the-book: dumped my own firmware, my own keys, and my own games.

      Fuck Nintendo for bullying these developers.

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a perk of emulation, but it isn’t the reason why someone would pirate over purchasing it. People just want free shit, but they have a weird mental block in admitting it.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Those are two different situations.

          There isn’t enough paying for shit that’s gonna make a mod run in an unmodified console. You can find people who have bought every single Pokémon game ever, and they still want to play romhacks and randomizers and such.

          There’s something to be said about how willing people are to pay and whether they admit it or why. But sounds more like you don’t want to believe there’s any other reason to do it.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I own original hardware and buy 100% of my games but sometimes you just wanna run games that aren’t originally crossplatform on your Steamdeck for convenience, or on a PC with resolution upscaling, or for ease of streaming the gameplay, or tons of other legitimate reasons.

      Can’t wait until our courts decide that, due to the prevalence of “remasters” that are just upscaled ROMs running on emulators, that this is no longer considered “fair use.”

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Fair use has nothing to do with this. Fair use has to do with distributing a copyrighted work. Emulators are (ideally) running completely original code that isn’t copied from the company’s source code. This is why, for example, PCSX2 has you use “your own” PS2 BIOS instead of including it.

        The PS2 BIOS is copyrighted, so it’s illegal to distribute it (and it’s never been “fair use” to distribute it). But it’s not illegal to do whatever you want with it (including dump it) as long as you own the console you’re dumping it from and as long as you don’t upload it to the internet for the purpose of distributing it to others. As far as the law is concerned, you bought the console and can do to it whatever you wish, provided you keep it to yourself and don’t distribute it to others.

        Games fall under the same category. You’re free to dump your games and play them however you wish, provided you don’t distribute the dumped game to other people. However, companies are also free to implement measures (DRM) to stop you from doing that as much as possible, likely because they know more people would illegally distribute them if they didn’t.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree with you, but Nintendo’s sales are definitely hurt meaningfully by piracy. Over a million people downloaded TOTK when it leaked.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        And I guarantee a lot, if not most, of those people didn’t even have Switches. If Nintendo had released a PC version they would have sold a ton more.

        • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          So what you’re saying is not only did they not buy a game, they also didn’t buy the system the game was developed for. So it definitely hurt Nintendo’s bottom line.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            But that’s on Nintendo. For those people the game doesn’t cost $70, it costs $200+ even if they buy a used Switch lite. Nintendo is deliberately leveraging their games to make people buy their console when those people just want to buy the game.

            They want to have their cake and eat it too, and that is most likely one of the biggest reasons people pirated TOTK.

            • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              23 hours ago

              leveraging their games to make people buy their console when those people just want to buy the game

              That’s the whole point of exclusive titles and every console vendor does it.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                All of Microsoft’s games are also on PC and even Sony has been putting many of their games there a year later. Nintendo’s the only one left that locks all of them to their console forever.

              • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Everybody doing it doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bad thing for customers and a reason for piracy.

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      doesn’t matter if they don’t know who you are, Nintendo can still offer you a ton of money to delete it. it wasn’t necessarily legal threats or I assume they would have sent the cease and desist to GitHub and gotten the repo removed first

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You’re not wrong. I just think that if you believe there is a good chance of having legal problems for your project (I don’t see why they wouldn’t have thought that), then it makes the most sense to do it anonymously from the beginning to avoid getting sued. Yes they can still possibly offer you money, but it might not be worth revealing your identity at that point either, as any continued development could be assumed to be you, and then you must defend yourself in court if they sue, even if it was never you.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Emulators have been legal in the past I thought. Sure, there’s something to be said about common sense and developing emulators for current generation platforms.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Whole reimplementations have survived. IBM BIOS was the only original BIOS for PCs. Phoenix Technologies had a team read the source code for IBM BIOS (it was published in the user manual for troubleshooting) and wrote a specification for it which a different team wrote software from, making IBM compatible machines possible

        I don’t know what law an emulator could be killed under, unless a license holder breached the user license as part of the development

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        IIRC, they’re legal as long as they don’t explicitly distribute any of the copyright owner’s own code or files. That’s why, for example, PCSX2 requires you to dump “your own” PS2 BIOS and doesn’t provide any itself. Because PCSX2 doesn’t distribute the PS2 BIOS and because its way of talking to the BIOS doesn’t copy the source code, that emulator is in the clear.

        Some modern emulators (ex. Ryujinx) don’t even need BIOS files (or whatever they’re called on Switch) to be able to run games. But they also don’t use Nintendo’s original code to run the game.

        Take all this with a grain of salt. I’m saying it from memory.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Yes, I wasn’t trying to refute that. But Nintendo can still ruin your life fighting a losing battle if they wanted to. To me it’s just not worth the risk of putting your name on it.

  • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well that sucks… I’m still pissed at Roblox for their DRM rug pull on Linux. Didn’t stop the bots and hackers for more than two weeks anyways - bet Ryujinx 2.0 will be out soon too.

    Anyone know if DRM is cracked on Roblox yet? Just a yes or no I can find it nevermind I’ll go look

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    fuck Nintendo and fuck fanboys who defend them at every turn. breath of the wild was a 7/10 game

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I say this as a die-hard 3D Zelda fan:

      I was soooo boooored in BOTW! There was no current main story. It all happened in the past. You’re basically playing through the climax the entire time. And I hated it. I mainly play Zelda for the story, and this was a very poorly told one.

      TOTK was somewhat better because it gave us better characters (I will die for Tulin), a bit better characterization (I enjoyed Zelda getting a lot more fleshed out this time), and a somewhat better story… but there were still way too many reused story beats. That is to say, the story was fleshed out much better, but they still reused the overall story structure from BOTW (get the memories fight the four bosses in the four temples, etc.). They did add a fifth temple and a mid-game story thing, but that’s mostly it. They also didn’t even acknowledge how similar some things were to their counterparts in BOTW (ex. the Malice Gloom), which really bothered me. Also, some stuff just felt… unfinished. Like the reporter bird who, by the end of it all, just ends up pondering and trying to figure himself out… and that’s it. It felt like setup for DLC, but there wasn’t any.

      … That was a very unintentionally long rant.

      To summarize: hated BOTW; somewhat enjoyed TOTK, though it could’ve been much better.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually hated BotW 😂

      Its insanely repetitive and I got so tired of watching the same cut scenes over and over with no way to skip them…

      I know it’s a hot take but don’t downvote me for my opinion haha.

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I would consider that cartoony as well. You might disagree but that’s ok. I’m not trying to pretend like my opinion is popular, it’s just how I personally feel.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Botw is easily a 9/10 for me . Totk too. I really like Nintendos take on open world. However, I still appreciate the other Zelda games a lot and I hope they don’t completely abandon that linear formula

      • dovahking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The world is interactive but bland. Except a few scenic vistas, there’s nothing interesting about the botw’s open world.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      All the more reason to buy their next system at V1.0 with 0 games.

      …keep it in the box for a year and keep an eye on a hack hitting the news.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I desperately wanted a switch 2 and been gaming on my mac using emu and a handful of native games until release.

      But at this point I’ll probably pick up the ps5 or steam deck just to avoid these folks ^

      • turtletracks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Steam Deck is a great option, I have a hub to be able to play on my TV, and don’t tell Nintendo, but a lot of Switch games run nicely.

        I have an SD full of every NES-N64 game with a bunch of GameCube thrown in too, it’s a beautiful thing. Plus gyro on old GameCube games is pretty funny

  • josephsh5@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is Nintendo in particular this aggressive against emulators? Why haven’t we heard of Sony going after PCSX2 and RPCS3, or Microsoft going after Xenia and Xemu?

    • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nintendo’s infamously protective of its IP, even to its obvious detriment. I know a lot of people who jumped on the nomoretendo bandwagon after AM2R got DMCA’d, because the smart and morally correct thing to do would have been to hire that person and pull his incredible talent into the next Metroid game, because they clearly had a lot of love and respect for the subject matter and the technical expertise to put it into action. It’s hard to overstate just how fucking good and polished that project was, virtually identical to the Fusion/Zero Mission engine, except in the ways it was more improved. It was certainly better than anything Nintendo had done with Metroid in quite a while.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is likely due to age and popularity. At this point PCSX2 is the only widely popular emulator you’ve listed, but is older, in the same way Dolphin is old and less of a concern of harming their limelight. That isn’t to say those other emulators aren’t making waves lately, but there is a window between age and popularity that makes this software a prime target. Especially emulators for current gen, which has been historically very rare, and when it did exist were no where near as good as CEMU, Yuzu, and Ryujinx were.

      • josephsh5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think this also shows how underpowered Nintendo consoles are; the Switch is essentially a slightly upgraded Wii U, which itself was only marginally better than the PS3 and Xbox 360! If Nintendo really wanted to combat piracy, all they had to do was beef up their flagship console to the point where it’s hard to emulate.

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          And triple their price? I guess the Switch is priced the way it’s priced so people can actually afford buying one.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        In general I’d agree, although Citra feels like an exception. I’m not quite sure why they targeted that one so hard.

        • Lesrid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’d guess it is because the most popular way to acquire games for Citra was Nintendo’s own servers

        • vinnymac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Probably for the same reason Nintendo shuttered the stores for 3DS and Wii U over the last year. They are attempting to consolidate infrastructure, support, user base, and sales.

          • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Now that Citra isn’t available, Nintendo knows I have no choice but to buy Samus Returns on my Switch!

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      According to what i’ve read around, the Switch 2 will be retro-compatible with the Switch and a big sellout will be possibility run all the old games in full hd with higher frames (something emulators already do better). Also this may have been used to adapt current emulators to the new console games.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because none of those emulate current generation systems.

      People act weirdly entitled about Nintendo product, throw shitfits when Nintendo reacts exactly like Sony or Microsoft would to them doing the same thing, then act extra hurt that Nintendo did it.

  • kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    There were so many Nintendo apologists when Yuzu was taken down because “Yuzu used actual nintendo source code, so that’s why they were taken down, it won’t happen to Ryujinx.” Yet here we are. Nintendo is by far the shittiest company when it comes to protecting their IP, because it’s all they have. Turns out, Mario is a fucking bootlicker

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t understand how people think getting rid of emulators is good. Having emulators is better as a consumer than not having them at all, since it can give gamers more ways to play their games and might incentivize Nintendo to add features to compete with emulators (think better res and fps, mod support, save states, no online requirement).

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Because a subset of people are and always will be idiots. Remember: some people think unions exist to steal your money, socialism is communist dictatorship propaganda, and privatization of government services is good for everybody.

      • _____@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nintendo fanboys are a special breed of stupid, arguing with them about Nintendo’s policies and anti consumer practices is just a wasted effort.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yuzu did not use “nintendo source code”.

      They simply hosted decryption keys in their repository. But that still was not the focus of Nintendo’s move. It was that Yuzu and its company profited directly from the release of The Legend of Zelda.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      because it’s all they have

      I’m not quite sure you fully understand what you said here, given your surrounding arguments. Nintendo literally cannot exist if they allow emulators without becoming just another Sony/Microsoft. And they cannot realistically compete against those two.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ve already found two repos that successfully copied everything over before the main repo disappeared. I even built a working copy of Ryujinx from one of them. I’d probably find several more easily if I tried hard enough.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t even use emulators for Switch because mine is hacked, but I felt the need to get the last Yuzu and Ryujinx on principle.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Guys quick a question. At the moment i have Ryujinx installed on my deck through Emudeck. Will it disappear with my next update???

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nah, Yuzu is still working fine on mine. Basically, if you had the emulator installed prior to the takedown, EmuDeck will continue to use it.

      Which is honestly a pretty good argument for just installing every single emulator (even if you never think you’ll use them!) because they don’t really take up that much space, and you could potentially lose access to them if you never bothered before a takedown.

    • riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Historically, no.

      When yuzu went down Emudeck was very specific that they will not remove any emulators that you have already installed.

  • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck Nintendo. All they have done is ensure I never buy one of their products again.

    • M600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same! In fact, I have a switch, but tears of the kingdom was the last thing I bought for it.

      I’ve skipped everything else. It’s not worth supporting an evil company.

  • AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I will always say this in these “Nintendo shuts down beloved fan project” threads: why don’t the people working on these projects operate anonymously and release via torrent? I feel like I’ve been reading the same story for 20 years. It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone at this point that Nintendo will come after you.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      230
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because emulation is legal. It shouldn’t have to be hidden. This was taken through the courts in 2001 with the Sony vs Bleem lawsuit.

      What appears to be happening is Nintendo is abusing its power and money to make threats of legal action that these groups just can’t afford to fight, even though they haven’t done anything illegal. It should be coming as a surprise that Nintendo is coming for them, because this is completely legal, and not some fan game using Nintendo IP (which is what they normally shut down).

      • millie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That sounds like grounds for some kind of legal action. Antitrust? Class action? I don’t know the specifics of the best strategy for approaching it, but if Nintendo is showing a pattern of using their legal team to harass legally operating emulator developers that sounds like something that should be actionable.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The Sony verdict didn’t establish emulation as legal

        At most you find that it established using mods/creating derivatives is illegal

        And on the low end it found that using pictures from competitors in advertising as comparison isn’t illegal

      • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        64
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Emulation might be legal, but it’s software specifically designed to run illegal copies of the games.

        I dislike Nintendo, but I can’t blame them for taking down that kind of software development. They’re still selling many of their old games through their own store for their own emulators. They’re perhaps charging way too much for it and/or lock it behind a subscription wall, even if you ever bought the original copies. Absolute garbage business practice, but from the corporate point of view I can see why they go after emulators. Especially since it’s easier to take those down than trying to go after all digital emulator copies of the games (if not impossible).

        They’re probably gonna try and set an example to scare off others trying to make new emulators too.

        Edit: lol people really are shooting the messenger here.

        Also, the amount of excuses that people have to make backups of their already purchased games is very weak. You damn well know that a vast majority of people don’t use it for such reasons, the amount of people that still own original copies, and also have the hardware to even extract software for personal use must be like less than a percentage of the entire community using emulators. They’re just people pirating games they never paid for. It’s very naive to assume otherwise.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That may be the main reason why people use or even create emulators, but there are still legitimate uses for emulators. It’s like banning couples from riding the same motorcycle because two people on a bike is usually a robbery.

        • degen@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair, it’s software specifically designed to run digital backups of what’s supposed to be personally owned media. It just so happens that it’s very easy to obtain a copy otherwise, but there’s nothing inherently illegal about it or the games.

          Strong arming independent projects, and individual developers especially, that are very careful to not endorse that, effectively holding them accountable for others, is morally questionable at best.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            From a theoretical point of view, emulators of modern consoles may actually be illegal. Under the DMCA, emulation for preservation is protected as a periodically-renewed exemption list defined by the library of congress. But, (paraphrasing) “creating or distributing any hardware or software device—or component of such—designed to circumvent DRM technology” is still illegal irrespective of any exemptions. A reasonable (and bullshit) interpretation of that means that any emulator which is capable of bypassing any DRM features (such as decrypting ROM using user-provided keys) is a violation under the act.

            I say theoretical because it hasn’t ever actually been tested in a court. Nintendo v. Tropic Haze LLC nearly gave us the answer, but the latter chose to settle instead.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I can’t blame them for taking down that kind of software development.

          Your not being able to blame them is completely irrelevant. Nintendo can not like stuff all it wants. The question is if it is LEGAL. If it is, and it is, your defense of their actions is a defense of the argument that they should be above the law because they don’t like something, and that’s an absolutely TERRIBLE position to take. You don’t need to white knight for Nintendo. They have more money than God and taking up their fights for them against your own rights as a consumer is so far beyond Stockholm Syndrome that I don’t think we even have a word for it yet.

          • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Feel like you failed to read and grasp what I said.

            Never said I agreed with what they’re doing, I am not white knighting them. I frankly don’t give a shit what Nintendo does and doesn’t and what they’ll lose over it.

            I was just stating an observation from a business point of view.

            It’s also legal to own guns in some countries, doesn’t make it legal to use it to just shoot at anything, and it’s even more ridiculous to assume that everyone buying/owning guns has good intentions. There are many countries where owning a gun isn’t legal, as well as making copies of products you’ve bought, even for personal backup.

            And to believe that people use emulation exclusively for their own backups is insanely naive.

            • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I gave you the benefit of the doubt that maybe I didn’t grasp what you said, but reading your reply it seems like I grasped it fine.

              Here’s the thing. People use emulators for piracy. That is also COMPLETELY and totally irrelevant to the discussion. The right to developing emulators is well-established, and game preservation isn’t even the most important consequence. The right to developing emulators is what allows virtualization that forms the backbone of server architecture, as well as running legacy code from old architectures on modern hardware, alleviating the need for thousands of man hours in rewriting tried and tested code. 20 years in the future, when the IoTs stupidity litters millions of homes with inaccessible, useless plastic garbage, emulation of no longer supported control units will be a panacea.

              Nintendo is totally free to not like the law, but it is the law, and this pressure to shut down these projects is a flagrant violation of the developers’ legal rights, which regardless of the morality of piracy is a disgusting flouting of the legal system.

              People use guns to murder, yes. But whether you or I think it’s correct or not, the law does not hold gun makers liable for the things their users do with them. We can’t just DECIDE that there are exceptions to the law and begin prosecuting or acting as if they are liable. That requires either a new law or an interpretation by a court to set a precedent - not lawyers sending a cease and desist to Smith & Wesson. That is a slippery slope to an absolutely nightmarish dystopia.

              There is no justifying this in a “Well, I can see why they did it…” sense any more than in a murder case. The law is clear. The established rights of the developers are clear. The right to make a Switch emulator is NOT Nintendo’s right to give or deny like a trademark dispute or the ability to make a fan game. They don’t GET a say. The right to make an emulator is explicitly YOURS by LAW. And a giant corporation has taken their money and used it to violate established rights with threat of bankruptcy in violation of that established law. If you believe in the rule of law, no matter what you think of piracy, that should be utterly haunting.

            • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              If guns are sold legally, it means that there is the assumption that everyone buying them has good intentions.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What do you think emulation is?

          Copying your own copy of a game and using tools for compatibility is what we’re talking about, is protected, and already has the case law demonstrating so.

        • parpol@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is made for various things like game development. When my company was working on remastering a GameCube game, Nintendo themselves handed us a devkit, and we used the dolphin emulator to play the original game and compare gameplay and performance.

      • AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        49
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is like if a pedestrian gets struck by a car while on a crosswalk. Yeah, they were allowed to be there… but they should have looked both ways before crossing the street.

        This is a case of people being idealistic rather than practical.

          • AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re talking about blame assignment, but I am instead referring to the fact that in both the Nintendo and the automotive example that somebody got smacked because they weren’t careful enough.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              37
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Somebody got smacked because they were told that this was a safe area to be in. Then they get hit, and are blamed for not being careful enough in the area they were told was safe to be in.

              • AsakuraMao@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                25
                ·
                2 days ago

                Like I said above, everyone coming through here is so obsessed with talking about blame and fault. That’s not what I’m talking about at all. I’m saying that if Ryujinx wanted to avoid this outcome, they should have done things differently.

                See, no mention of blame at all. How else do I need to spell things out for the extremely autistic and pedantic crowd here?

                • jeeva@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  if Ryujinx wanted to avoid this outcome, they should have done things differently

                  How do you not read this as blame? Or, is this not the same as “they had it coming, wouldn’t have happened if they’d been dressed in armour or hadn’t gone down that street alone” which is often known as victim blaming.

                  Oh, there’s a wiki article on that. It has a section on the thing you’re arguing about, with cars and pedestrians Neat. Maybe this is why people are talking about it.

        • kfchan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          ITT: people not understanding the difference between BLAME and OUTCOME and downvoting you because of it. Incidentally, I also read a thread earlier today that talked about declining literacy in adults…

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nintendo didn’t put legal pressure on emulator devs for decades at this point, which made devs less cautious about preserving their pseudonymity.

      Now it’s too late and they can’t stop Nintendo from finding out who they are and which mistakes they did at some point over the years.

      Maybe a new generation of emulator developers will be more protective of their identity, by using hosting providers like Njalla or privacy networks like i2p. The latter would limit access (as it requires i2p), which isn’t desirable for most users.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And because these are never finished projects. People can rant and rave about cloning the git all day, but without active, knowledgeable developers with the knowledge of the original dev team, these projects are dead. It’s not about using the emulators as they exist today… it’s about continuing to keep them working going forward. Anything that releases in the last year or two of the Switch’s life is now at risk of being lost forever into Nintendo’s archives.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anything that releases in the last year or two of the Switch’s life is now at risk of being lost forever into Nintendo’s archives.

        Somebody will archive it, for two reasons: 1) data hoarders and 2) hacked Switches.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, it will be as playable as it is right now, right as the project shuts down. Any updates or improvements? Any new games? Only if someone else takes up the mantle and risks having world police nintendo suing them

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            I assume emulator development will continue eventually. Who knows when that will be, though.

            The thing that sucks is that I’m in the middle of a couple of games, so if something upgrades and Ryujinx isn’t compatible, I’m hosed.