‘Not too complex’: health experts criticise Labor for ditching LGBTQI+ census questions - eviltoast
  • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m confused. I thought the end result last week was that they would include the questions. But now they’re again saying it’s too hard?

    • zero_gravitas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      While the government has said there will be a question on sexual orientation, it has not reversed the decision to cancel work on the other questions which would give a baseline on the number of trans, gender diverse and people with variations of sex characteristics.

      I hadn’t realised this. It was reported everywhere just as the decision to cut questions having been reversed, not partially reversed.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        @Zagorath@aussie.zone Albanese tried to weasel his way out of it by suggesting there will be one new question (relating to sexuality I think) and that existing census contained questions which could be updated.

  • threeduck@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I dunno, I’m kinda of two minds. On one hand, it’s definitely good to know the breadth of the LGBT+ community, for further policy decisions and what have you - ALL info is good info.

    On the other hand, what business does the government have knowing what I do in the privacy of my bedroom? Aside from the legal aspects of sexuality which I believe are fairly equal now (marriage laws, adoption laws etc), why do they wanna know who I’m blasting nuts into?