Vancouver votes against more housing density in Shaughnessy neighbourhood: Boyle argues neighbourhood is centrally located and doesn’t have much rental stock or affordable housing - eviltoast
  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How else will my house become an exclusive commodity that nobody can afford if everybody gets one?!

    Fucking communism.

    • RehRomano@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      their answers mostly hovered around it being “divisive.” if you’re wondering what the fuck that means in the context of more housing for people, I’m right there with you.

      they also said the provincial regulations will take care of this. That’s literally not true because of Shaugnessy’s exclusive zoning status.

      in short, they don’t have a coherent argument against Boyle’s motion outside of pettiness.

      • Hadouken Shoryuken@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just read the press release on their website.The main reason they said is because it would waste city staff time and resources… So basically as u said, no reason.

        • Victor Villas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          it would waste city staff time and resources

          Meanwhile they do exactly that with the speed cameras motion. “Let’s study this for two years more, even though it has been continuously studied for the past decades”.

          • Hadouken Shoryuken@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, if we assume their formula to calculate usefulness of initiatives is “resources spent”/ " return". No wonder they will do the speed camera. When return is 0 the usefulness becomes infinite. I have been humbled.

    • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a statement, ABC Vancouver councillor Rebecca Bligh said the motion would have “wasted precious staff time” and called the motion redundant, given motions recently passed by the city and province to add more housing.

      Don’t worry, they’ve already solved the housing crisis!

      • RehRomano@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        wow thank godness for their restraint, god forbid we have too much housing in this city and it becomes too cheap to live here. BULLET DODGED!