‘Who Benefits?’ Inside the EU’s Fight over Scanning for Child Sex Content - eviltoast
  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Typical government move. Have a blatantly obvious questionable agenda to make spying on citizens easier, but tie it to something like children or “freedom”. Makes it easy to go “don’t you care about the children?!” This approach is so lazy it’s both insulting and nauseating.

    • oroboros@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder how many children will be saved. Surely they’ve calculated this, given the high cost of freedom of information/speech being severely restricted.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably none. Currently police has not enough men to even work through current data. Of course more data will fix this problem

        • HidingCat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tangentially related to this, but this is something that should be talk about with legislation more often: Will the new law be enforceable? And at what cost?